View of Florence by Thomas Cole
View the artwork: View of Florence →
When Thomas Cole sailed from New York to Italy in 1837, he was the most famous landscape painter in America. He returned months later in disgrace. This painting, View of Florence, is the reason.
Cole was sent to Europe by a wealthy New York patron who wanted a series of imaginary Italian scenes: dramatic, romantic, invented landscapes in the grand manner. Instead Cole stood on a hillside outside Florence and painted exactly what he saw. He called it a mere portrait of the place. Every dome, bell tower, and terracotta chimney sits in its documented position. The Arno river winds through the valley just as it did. Brunelleschi's dome anchors the skyline exactly where it belongs.
The patron was furious. American critics piled on, calling the work a topographical diagram dressed up as art. The commission collapsed. Cole packed the canvas and came home humiliated. He would spend the rest of his career painting the Hudson River Valley and the Catskills: imaginary edens far from the complicated cities of Europe. He never painted another Italian city. View of Florence sits today in a museum as the painting that broke Thomas Cole.
What do you think, was Cole's patron right to demand an invented fantasy, or does the real Florence deserve the canvas more?
#arthistory #thomascole #florence
Details
Transcript
Thomas Cole sailed to Italy a celebrated painter. He returned to America humiliated. This is the painting that did it. Cole called his Florence a mere portrait. Every dome, tower, and chimney in its exact place. But American critics were disgusted. His patron demanded a wild, imaginary landscape. Cole gave him a topographical map in oil.